Monday 23 July 2012

Flopzilla Blog 1

I bought Flopzilla lately and have been messing around with it. Can't believe it's taken me this long actually, it's actually superbly useful and I'm going to use this as the basis for my 'outside playing time' work until I learn to use CREV better (I'll do that when wtflop.com finally opens). By the wtflop.com is being run by D2themfi and is basically offering training in crEV and using it to get better.

So anyway, Flopzilla. I'll start posting more detailed simulations etc on here, but for now here's stuff I've realised/ learned/ had cemented.

1) People miss unconnected boards a lot! Sounds obvious, but I think probably I've been way too concerned with how a board hits my perceived range over how a board just misses theirs. Example,
say we flat OTB VS a tight 15.8% UTG range. 2 flops, one is 652cc, another is k62cc. We're assuming villain cbets 100% because most simply do on these boards from these positions. We're assuming that if we play back villain will attempt to re-play back with any gutshot +.



In the past, I'd probably be more likely to play back on the 652 than the k62. Reason is I can 'rep more' yada yada, but honestly I think at 200nl, and (Zoom 200nl in particular where everything is played so much more in a vacuum) the fact that the 652cc allows him to play back 53% of the time and and the K62cc 37% of the time is worth so much more.

Sticking with the k62cc board, the 37% assumes that villain folds 77-QQ on the flop. If he flats TT-QQ and folds the rest, his overall fold is around 50%, but then given only ~ 20% of his continuing range after the flop is a flushdraw or set that won't fold 3flushes, we can still expect a lot of folds on future streets.

2) Flatting 3bets, middling suited connectors and 1 gappers connect more than I realised.



Say we raise these hands from CO, 13% SB 3bet us. I've been folding of late probably a lot more than I should. Maybe I've ran insanely badly at connecting, but when I flat 86s I feel like I'm burning money 'cos the flop is always QQJr or whatever. Instinctively, I only need at least 1 pair or a GS to play back, and this is saying I get it 56% of the time. Importantly, on many of the the kind of boards where I make a GS+, our opponent can only continue between 36% and 46% of the time. So in a vaccum VS a wide cbettor a strategy of flatting OESD+ and raising the weaker parts of our range should be printing money even without our equity.

Anyway, sure I've made a lot of mistakes, but I do think if I keep looking at this stuff and writing about it then something will go in. Like, we all know that our pocket pairs make sets ~ 1 in 8.5 times. We know QQ is a very slight favourite over AK preflop. It's probably inexcusable that I don't know, for example, on exactly what % of flops I can continue if I flat 87s in the BB. I want to get to that stage basically..............