Not too many big pots in any of these sessions, but again the constant picking away with PF minraises VS nits, double barrels, 3bets, and bluff raises shows a steadily increasing cash line.
Some interesting hands and spots though:
http://weaktight.com/2543679 - snap shoved the river. I might've folded though to one of those scary 'time 4 seconds' shoves which to me basically represent villain having the nuts and wanting to enjoy the moment a little bit longer.
http://weaktight.com/2543681 - I think in spots like this on the flop you have to decide if you're going with the hand (obv am), then count the number of scary cards if you flat. Any J,Q,A makes up 12 cards and a ~25% chance of hitting on the turn, too high in my book so I just clicked it back.
http://weaktight.com/2543682 - standard/ who cares whatever, but this is a guy who just wasn't tuned into the fact that him being a PF animal meant I just wasn't 3betting him light whatsoever. That's where concentrating and actual gameflow would've saved him money, rather than just looking at my 18% SB 3bet stat or whatever it is.
Biggish folds:
http://weaktight.com/2543685 - I mean I guess he has TT exactly, but there was no reason for him to bluff 3bet this and there's a good chance he had KQ as well. I didn't fancy finding out for half the pot though and I think % equity wise against his range a fold is marginally correct.
http://weaktight.com/2543689 - call me ridiculous, I don't care. I was tuned into him enough to bet fold this on the flop. He's cally not aggressive, he doesn't have AK or KQ and everything smokes me.
Is all, dan
1 comment:
Hey dude, in hand 1, did u call solely cos of his timing of the shove? or is it because our bet size on river s on the smaller size? so our hand looks like a good hand but not the nuts?
Post a Comment